From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 11 06:27:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2991106566C; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from smtp3.yandex.ru (smtp3.yandex.ru [213.180.223.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D0B8FC0C; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:27:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from ns.kirov.so-cdu.ru ([77.72.136.145]:64987 "EHLO [127.0.0.1]" smtp-auth: "bu7cher" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP id S4747769AbYDKGKs (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:10:48 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: smtp3 X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1207894248 X-MsgDayCount: 3 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at smtp3.yandex.ru logged sender identity as: bu7cher Message-ID: <47FF00E6.8070108@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:10:46 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5 (FreeBSD/20051231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lev@FreeBSD.org References: <396418019.20080409104542@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <396418019.20080409104542@serebryakov.spb.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [SO]HO Software RAID5 server: which implementation should I choice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:27:11 -0000 Lev Serebryakov wrote: > (4) FreeBSD 7 + ZFS "zraid". And again: stability. Too many messages > about locks, crashes, etc. Code is experemental. Is it only for > 32 bit systems? Recently I installed a new server in my local network. [media butcher]# uname -rsm FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT amd64 [media butcher]# zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT video 3,16T 2,01T 1,14T 63% ONLINE - [media butcher]# zpool status pool: video state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM video ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/DISK_01 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/DISK_02 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/DISK_03 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/DISK_04 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/DISK_05 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/DISK_06 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/DISK_07 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors [media butcher]# sysctl hw.physmem hw.physmem: 2136186880 [media butcher]# cat /boot/loader.conf zfs_load="YES" vm.kmem_size="1342177280" # 1280 MB vm.kmem_size_max="1342177280" # 1280 MB So, server works very nice on moderate load with vsftpd (with sendfile enabled) - 40..70 users online. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov