From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 8 07:20:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACFC16A4CE; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 07:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC3543D49; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 07:20:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i38EJMlt087634 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Apr 2004 10:19:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: by aldan.algebra.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i38EJ6aA087633; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 10:19:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin To: ports@FreeBSD.org, hdfnews@ncsa.uiuc.edu Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:19:05 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 05:14:48 -0700 cc: kay_lehmann@web.de cc: flynn@energyhq.homeip.net cc: tilman@arved.de cc: yuri@irfu.se cc: toyonaga@msd.ts.fujitsu.co.jp cc: aa8vb@nc.rr.com cc: ijliao@FreeBSD.org cc: corecode@corecode.ath.cx cc: tg@FreeBSD.org cc: koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu Subject: graphics/opendx and dropping science/hdf X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 14:20:06 -0000 Hello! I intend to drop the science/hdf port. It was obsoleted by hdf5 long ago (was it?), it breaks on some some 64bit platforms, it conflicts with math/netcdf. All the technical issues are, probably, fixable, but the obsoleteness makes them not worth the effort. Or so it seems. The only port relying on science/hdf is graphics/opendx and only if WITH_HDF is defined. Unfortunately, opendx does not (yet?) support hdf5. So... . Does hdf5 really obsolete hdf4? . Does hdf support add much value to opendx at all, or can we just remove it? . If not, should I (or some other helping hand) try to patch opendx to use hdf5? or . bring the old hdf4 into the 21st century (fixing the types, depending on math/netcdf instead of building its own)? Thanks for any ideas, -mi