Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 02:31:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Adam Strohl <adams@digitalspark.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, N <niels@bakker.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2xPIIIx450 results & NFS results Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909190230380.2585-100000@nightfall.digitalspark.net> In-Reply-To: <199909190625.XAA54133@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > So far about alls I have confirmed is that the problem does not exists > with BIOS 1009 when the apm code is not compiled into the kernel. I'll > have a full matrix of with/without apm 1008/1009/1010 some time tomarrow, > as the machines are building there system disks now. Sounds good. Is there a way to detect the BIOS revision on boot or something and either warn (ie; Say "Update yer BIOS!") or install a work around? - ----( Adam Strohl )------------------------------------------------ - - UNIX Operations/Systems http://www.digitalspark.net - - adams (at) digitalspark.net xxx.xxx.xxxx xxxxx - - ----------------------------------------( DigitalSpark.NET )------- - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909190230380.2585-100000>