Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:24:32 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: <freebsd-perl@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: why fully versionned vendorlib vendorbin and vendorarch? Message-ID: <51bb94aac2e461394eb532e5481fe053@etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <af4873556ee9d4537fbcefe759b39d57@etoilebsd.net> References: <af4873556ee9d4537fbcefe759b39d57@etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:18:06 +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi, > > I can't get why we used versionned vendorbin, vendorarch and > vendorlib with perl it seems to only provide us problems: need of > perl-after-upgrade, reinstallation of most p5- things after even a > simple 5.12.3 -> 5.12.4 upgrade? > > why not follow what is done by default by the build system and use a > string (not versionned for those variable) like perl5_vendors or > something like that? > > That would also allow user to upgrade from 5.12 to 5.14 almost > painless. if really changing from 5.12 to 5.14 can lead to majors > incompatibility problems (which I'm not convinced at all) we could > use > perl5.12 but not including the minor version which still is not that > good to me but way better. > > regards, > Bapt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-perl@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-perl-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" As noone object I think that may say I can go ahead and fix that? regards, Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51bb94aac2e461394eb532e5481fe053>