From owner-cvs-all  Fri Jul 30  0:29: 5 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CE254156DE; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA47031;
	Fri, 30 Jul 1999 09:27:09 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: green@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c
References: <199907300117.LAA09942@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 30 Jul 1999 09:27:08 +0200
In-Reply-To: Bruce Evans's message of "Fri, 30 Jul 1999 11:17:37 +1000"
Message-ID: <xzppv1a38dv.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> writes:
> > > > >   8 -> NBBy
> > > > "number of bits by byte"?
> > > Yep, that's exactly what it is. NBBY is much preferred to hardcoding 8 :)
> > BITS_PER_BYTE is much preferred to NBBY.
> You mean "Standard C's CHAR_BIT is much preferred to NBBy" when the number
> of bits in a byte is actually wanted.

Yes, but that's not what's wanted here. Or rather, what's wanted here
is the number of bits per *network* byte.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message