From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 18:39:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C33DA1C for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48F151DCA for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id j15so2838642qaq.2 for ; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:39:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tBB8XPCzEvFVZzGxrsGcn/Oss2TfJQfWvPUHj6J8CsI=; b=oWvaGTPwygUklUyUJ8/rJ1hVmjayaXqir7jr6qxGR9ge8XXLVKLgSACK7JV9n5Fqmr 2VCQNObUt94zCeL5I7/FZ6my0lQvsFWmioS6WJCZqQ2yjJN/jJmC3l+JYlUvH+nIWccf Y11qbDTPUoDx/mbhUOmMcN2JU9yRHsFVKFLhVZ0PbdL9Kg4BlaLyNJXpwa/vWGbbsk/3 IuV8+FpRU9ZRMPlcORkJW10VrLFIupCGpW6NBStFBLwFImAWq2D9OnB0d77Cs/JED2Cx h7v/uTuYPTgjNf9+ktVwBdod3vifdzuPtStbWBiLn8asjxFYimcNdf6uI5TCL/OBepQ6 KryQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.23.148 with SMTP id 20mr13970949qgp.89.1397068778389; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: pldrouin@gmail.com Received: by 10.96.104.42 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:39:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1397068585974-5902068.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <53454EFA.3040207@tundraware.com> <53454F42.8070003@tundraware.com> <1397068357794-5902066.post@n5.nabble.com> <1397068585974-5902068.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:39:38 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LBwj3e6-Wq0flntxz1xJ5yUQlKQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Does openssl Fix Bump The Version Number? From: Pierre-Luc Drouin To: Jakub Lach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 18:39:39 -0000 I meant that the SVN revision of my src tree is r264303, and "openssl version" returns: OpenSSL 1.0.1e-freebsd 11 Feb 2013 so I am not sure if the patch was applied or not... On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: > May I rephrase, what is "the same issue"? There was a fix for 10-STABLE > (I've > linked it), albeit there was no version bump. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Does-openssl-Fix-Bump-The-Version-Number-tp5901973p5902068.html > Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >