From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 25 15:21:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83839106566C for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f191.google.com (mail-qy0-f191.google.com [209.85.221.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3416A8FC08 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so2872420qyk.3 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:21:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=FSImNUh7m0sZMllQzaDM8TJyipxW12WubCpoAgtP9F0=; b=YoDdDVmqjSFE3HYm/+Ki2kRDwQ12z9ZJblSMgQDWelVWgJo/2WN8PB3ECOMgA1AbhK 0y08/x2gUfbKhRObujJA10xiWnbvoy40Z3Lq7Sg4Z5sv1qj2GYpFR6d7JTDPcVbVAkjj X2Z7VE2SX491ART7Sywj7B7g3s/ct0KTjZw00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=QA/wDE6PRmtCKk3Z397BPqYpDcYQ/zIDtJVJ0fdZH40ACGgc6mvuwSt5AJZGESP2a9 F9FP7KosNBPIfYWJWMjB7BWF0dXC2LAKF412lC74iICZUDPk8CrgUlHzxK6dohS7tQkP hkMKLhR853taxmYNFQZy7qVx72fHE8U7V7U0A= Received: by 10.224.45.149 with SMTP id e21mr4362888qaf.275.1248533431242; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kan.dnsalias.net (c-98-217-224-113.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.217.224.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm6901152qwe.47.2009.07.25.07.50.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:50:20 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20090725105020.66e281ee@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <46928623@ipt.ru> References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090725115525.GA85767@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725123749.GA26505@abigail.blackend.org> <46928623@ipt.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.2; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/QTTM/tAnfFU2Bwu.jR0.zoi"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:21:50 -0000 --Sig_/QTTM/tAnfFU2Bwu.jR0.zoi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:36:00 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: >=20 > As for the original question. I don't use flash so can't be very > helpful here. But there are reports at emulation@ ML that both > linux-f8-flashplugin10 and linux-f10-flashplugin10 work better > then flashplugin[7|9]. >=20 It does not work very well under Linux32 compat on -current - our futex implementation seems to be too broken and causes frequent deadlock and causes multiple threads to get stuck on process exit. One can easily collect dozens of those stuck processes doing causal web browsing. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/QTTM/tAnfFU2Bwu.jR0.zoi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKaxuyQ6z1jMm+XZYRAt6sAJ47Glr60hpf9+dgQXSXSpws6JzO3wCffw4H mEAymedvzSpoZdW0N1QXFQY= =5AYF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/QTTM/tAnfFU2Bwu.jR0.zoi--