Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 11:01:19 -0500 From: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp>, andrews@technologist.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Possible change in the Qt port. Message-ID: <3825A24F.A98124BC@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> References: <38209354.5A0E1416@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> <3.0.6.32.19991103230433.008afc90@mail.psn.net> <19991106044140H.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> <vqcaeoqpseq.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
>
...
>
> Wait, are you suggesting we move things like
>
> ${PREFIX}/bin/qt* -> ${PREFIX}/lib/qt/bin/
> ${PREFIX}/lib/libqt* -> ${PREFIX}/lib/qt/lib/
> ${PREFIX}/include/qt2/ -> ${PREFIX}/lib/qt/include/qt2/
>
> (the filenames are hypothetical, I don't know if qt has any
> executables -- just take these as examples of the idea)
>
There is a binary: moc, AFAIK it's onlt used during the building process
in some ports and they expect to find it in $(QTDIR)/bin.
> If so, I'm against this change. There are reasons and history behind
> us asking ports to conform to our hier; this runs completely counter
> to it.
>
Not really; we already use this approach when the port wants to create
it's own directory. The example that comes to mind is Scilab. Lesstif is
a case where NOT applying this is clearly violating hier().
cheers,
Pedro.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3825A24F.A98124BC>