Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 17:04:00 -0500 (EST) From: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@posi.net> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: Wes Bauske <wsb@paralleldata.com>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/15611: EIDE Large Disk Support, Newfs problem, File systemcorruption,IBM-DPTA-353750 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10001051701350.66090-100000@kronos.alcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10001051336330.6001-100000@beppo.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > I don't think a 4.0 kernel on to of 3.x works very well- probably does, > but why stretch it? I have no idea about the upgrade path- I just do a > forklift upgrade myself. It won't work. 4.0 has undergone some much-needed restructuring with regards to it's signal implementation. Upgrading from 3.x has, as a result, become the topic of much debate on the -current mailing list. But it is sufficient to say that a 4.0 kernel and 3.x world will not mix. Kelly -- Kelly Yancey - kbyanc@posi.net - Richmond, VA Analyst / E-business Development, Bell Industries http://www.bellind.com/ Maintainer, BSD Driver Database http://www.posi.net/freebsd/drivers/ Coordinator, Team FreeBSD http://www.posi.net/freebsd/Team-FreeBSD/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10001051701350.66090-100000>