From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Sep  5 12:42:13 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA13260
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from applink.applink.net (root@applink.applink.net [206.149.40.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA13254
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 12:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eagle.applink.net.applink.net (eagle.applink.net [206.149.40.181]) by applink.applink.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA30416 for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 14:44:17 -0500
Message-Id: <199609051944.OAA30416@applink.applink.net>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <eagle@mail.applink.net>
From: "Robert Garrett" <eagle@applink.applink.net>
To: current@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 14:43:17 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: A few comments: RE:current build failure
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.32a)
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I know i am breaking protocol after all i havent' read current for 
several months, but i still feel like there is an easy solution to 
the problem that seems to be perveating this discussion...

1. Change the name of current to reflect its a development source....
2. weekly or so... produce a tree that builds so it can be tested...
3. rename the snapshots to somthing to reflect the idea that they are 
    more stable in nature...

well thats my idea now i will keep my mouth shut and go on about my 
business..

thanks for listening...