From owner-freebsd-security  Fri May 21 10:28:40 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from ints.ru (ints.ru [194.67.173.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F6514E67
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 21 May 1999 10:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ilmar@ws-ilmar.ints.ru)
Received: from ws-ilmar.ints.ru (ws-ilmar.ints.ru [194.67.173.16])
	by ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA18530;
	Fri, 21 May 1999 21:28:35 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ws-ilmar.ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA10557;
	Fri, 21 May 1999 21:28:34 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 21:28:34 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" <ilmar@ints.ru>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Cc: posix1e@cyrus.watson.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: secure deletion
In-Reply-To: <xzp1zgaqsjv.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905212123450.10543-100000@ws-ilmar.ints.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On 21 May 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:

> > My thoughts are about an option in kernel config file (WIPEINFO?)
> A mount option would be better.
Why mount option? Secure deletion is a feature of fs and impacts files of
this on this fs. All of them. So why use mount option?




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message