Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 04 Apr 2010 11:51:58 +0200 (CEST)
From:      sthaug@nethelp.no
To:        hrs@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        dougb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ipv6_enable 
Message-ID:  <20100404.115158.74708010.sthaug@nethelp.no>
In-Reply-To: <20100404.184141.03733377.hrs@allbsd.org>
References:  <4BB7E224.6020508@FreeBSD.org> <20100404053352.E6F751CC13@ptavv.es.net> <20100404.184141.03733377.hrs@allbsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>  No, my intension is not to compare IPv4 and IPv6 here.  We have never
>  enable L3 address autoconfiguration without explicit configuration
>  before.  This is reasonable and should be kept for IPv6, too.

Agree 100%. Having IPv6 SLAAC as the default is a bad idea.

On the other hand, I *do* like a single rc.conf knob (ipv6_enable) for
the top level IPv6 functionality - even if it doesn't do a 100% job.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100404.115158.74708010.sthaug>