From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Nov 16 01:46:52 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id BAA24180
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 Nov 1995 01:46:52 -0800
Received: from iselgw.ilab.toshiba.co.jp (iselgw.ilab.toshiba.co.jp [202.249.10.129])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA24161
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 1995 01:46:46 -0800
Received: by iselgw.ilab.toshiba.co.jp (8.6.7/MMLAB-1.0) with UUCP
	id SAA28502; Thu, 16 Nov 1995 18:46:20 +0900
Received: from ilab-master.ilab.toshiba.co.jp by isel3.mmlab.toshiba.co.jp (5.67+1.6W/6.4J.6-mmlab_2.60)
	id AA08178; Thu, 16 Nov 95 18:44:11 JST
Received: from pdcd-mail.pdcd.ilab.toshiba.co.jp by ilab-master.ilab.toshiba.co.jp (8.6.11+2.5Wb2/3.3W9-ilab2.1) with ESMTP
	id SAA06043; Thu, 16 Nov 1995 18:44:10 +0900
Received: by pdcd-mail.pdcd.ilab.toshiba.co.jp (8.6.11+2.5Wb2+PDCD/3.3W9-pdcd7.1) with ESMTP
	id SAA22815; Thu, 16 Nov 1995 18:44:23 +0900
Message-Id: <199511160944.SAA22815@pdcd-mail.pdcd.ilab.toshiba.co.jp>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua, tateoka@pdcd.ilab.toshiba.co.jp,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is TTYHOG too small? (Re: STARTECH ...550CP chips are Ok for me. ) 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Nov 1995 14:42:20 +1100."
             <199511160342.OAA32756@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 18:44:07 +0900
From: Masamichi Tateoka <tateoka@pdcd.ilab.toshiba.co.jp>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> Are you using hardware flow control in both directions?  I think uucp's
> `hardflow' option only applies to outgoing connections.  To initialize

I had the problem while outgoing UUCP connections.
The opposite side was linux box that's using hard flow control.

             Masamichi Tateoka
             tateoka@pdcd.ilab.toshiba.co.jp
             tateoka@yasai.forus.or.jp (HOME)