Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:43:17 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@deepcore.dk> To: Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22=5C=22S=F8ren=5C=22_Schmidt=22?= <sos@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Any successful installs on a Broadcom HT1000 chipset? Message-ID: <474BCA95.6000403@deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <512683.5780.qm@web63911.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <512683.5780.qm@web63911.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Barney Cordoba wrote: > --- S=F8ren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.org> wrote: > > =20 >> Mike Tancsa wrote: >> =20 >>> At 07:26 AM 11/21/2007, Barney Cordoba wrote: >>> =20 >>>> I've done a bit of research and it seems that >>>> =20 >> this >> =20 >>>> chipset has been ignored for years now by the >>>> =20 >> FreeBSD >> =20 >>>> team. Whats the reasoning for a major chipset >>>> =20 >> used by >> =20 >>> I think you are jumping to conclusions. I have a >>> =20 >> HT1000 chipset board=20 >> =20 >>> and have been using it just fine for some time.=20 >>> >>> =20 > (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-November/07992= 0.html) > =20 >>> There obviously are some cases were it does not, >>> =20 >> so its harder to=20 >> =20 >>> track down than just a case of spending $150. If >>> =20 >> you do have such a=20 >> =20 >>> board that does not work, perhaps make the offer >>> =20 >> of sending the=20 >> =20 >>> problem board to a developer who is interested in >>> =20 >> fixing the issue. >> That would be an excelent idea :) >> >> As usual I'll try to get any ATA/SATA HW that shows >> up on my doorstep=20 >> working, thats the deal. >> I dont have the means nor the motivation to spend my >> own hard earned $$=20 >> on all kinds of HW to get someone out there free >> support, simple as that.. >> >> That said, I do have a HT1000 based board around a >> supermicro H8SSL that=20 >> is used as a busy local fileserver, needless to say >> it works flawlessly. >> >> So, to get this worked on and hopefully fixed, get >> me a failing board to=20 >> work on here... private mail with address details >> etc can be had on=20 >> request... >> >> -S=F8ren >> >> =20 > > Is your busy file server running 7.0, and is it > running in SATA mode? The MBs we've tried are H8SSP-i > and an H8SSL-i, both with the same, unsuccessful > results: bad file reads, signals when trying to run > apps, crash-and-burn on buildworld wthin 5 seconds. > =20 This server has been running -current all the time with about biweekly=20 updates, so it has made the transition all the way from about 6.1 to=20 todays current without problems. > Something happened between 6.2 and 7.0, as we were > able to run 6.2 on these systems. > > =20 Looks like a pattern, something outside of ATA also caused HW issues on=20 some Promise controllers to appear in this period. Just checked and nothing in ATA changed in regards to either the HT1000=20 or the Promise HW, its the same support code thats been there all the tim= e. It could be a sideeffect of now having more fine grained locking etc,=20 that makes these problems show up, your guess is as good as mine. Again, the sticky point is that if I cant reproduce a problem here its=20 very hard to work on it, if not just plain impossible... -S=F8ren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?474BCA95.6000403>