From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 11:11:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4711437B407 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 11:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EED43F3F for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 11:11:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr) Received: from heho.snv.jussieu.fr (heho.snv.jussieu.fr [134.157.184.22]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.12.9/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id h52IB75Q009657 ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:11:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from heho.snv.jussieu.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h52IB7O3052631 ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:11:07 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from arno@localhost) by heho.snv.jussieu.fr (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h52IB7F4052628; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:11:07 +0200 (MEST) To: Maksim Yevmenkin References: <20030601222557.48106.qmail@web40304.mail.yahoo.com> From: arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr Date: 02 Jun 2003 20:11:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030601222557.48106.qmail@web40304.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Polishing touch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:11:10 -0000 > here what is (probably) going on. when system starts up you have > no "tap0" interface. ifconfig(8) can not find "tap0" interface and hmmm, dunno, long before ifconfig I get : tap0: bpf attached > now the thing about tap(4) (and tun(4)) interfaces is that they are > *virtual*, i.e. in order to create interface one need to open > corresponding character device first, i.e. /dev/tapX (or /dev/tunX). yip; NB, I think we should concentrate on tun0 anyway, since "device tun" is in GENERIC, whilst tap0 is a hack of mine ... Arno