Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 19:08:06 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> Cc: "office@freebsd.org" <office@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bumping libreoffice Message-ID: <CADLo838ZVzg%2BJ86j%2BF-40sA_88o4cxECw3R0pUtUzX6ikXkWpQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <511548F2.4030303@bsdforen.de> References: <511548F2.4030303@bsdforen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 February 2013 18:50, Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> wrote: > Please take note of Porters' Handbook section 5.2.2.1. > > Build fixes are NOT a reason to bump portrevision! Bash completion was also added, so the package did actually change :) Obviously you're annoyed at having to rebuild, and I understand that, but standard practice is to bump whenever the resultant package changes, which in this case it did- up to date packages should be built on the package building machines. Whether or not the change was *really* worth it is neither here nor there, but I might recommend that you do what I do and simply hold libreoffice (along with other monster ports) and update it manually. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838ZVzg%2BJ86j%2BF-40sA_88o4cxECw3R0pUtUzX6ikXkWpQ>