Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:12:21 +1000 From: Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au> To: Frank Leonhardt <freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf or ipfw for NAT Message-ID: <15b7d9be-aec3-e2c7-ee80-8da7960eb9c4@heuristicsystems.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3c99a18b-a8c6-acb6-bf4c-03e4783cab88@fjl.co.uk> References: <50dcf18d-f9c3-71c2-abb0-eed8f1b5e192@fjl.co.uk> <20210402210356.637a3ed714957fb9c5fdfa3a@sohara.org> <1ff607ca-79cc-3072-831c-54659920e9dc@fjl.co.uk> <20210403092058.97c46ba70579026e9bd929a1@sohara.org> <3c99a18b-a8c6-acb6-bf4c-03e4783cab88@fjl.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/04/2021 4:21 am, Frank Leonhardt wrote: ... > I think so too. I set it and it works perfectly. I'm really wondering > why I've bothered with natd - just using pf works a treat. > You probably missed the creation of nat functionality in the kernel, via options LIBALIAS options IPFIREWALL_NAT ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15b7d9be-aec3-e2c7-ee80-8da7960eb9c4>