From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 11 20:12:49 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E8AB65
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9F2163A
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4BKCnio021152
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:12:49 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 199905] PCH bustage when building with GCC on -CURRENT kernel
 (fatal error: had to relocate PCH)
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:12:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, regression
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: feld@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-199905-13-dJVrhndbCS@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199905-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-199905-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:12:49 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905

--- Comment #5 from Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #4)

This has already been covered in this commit log

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=384056

There is no interest in hacking gcc to play nice with pch, and it doesn't make
sense because the older releases that have gcc as the base compiler are not
going to continue to receive updates. It's much easier to just patch a dozen
ports and move on.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.