Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 10:16:17 -0400 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, Luoqi Chen <luoqi@watermarkgroup.com> Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, imp@village.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/aic aic.c Message-ID: <19991028101617.29808@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <199910280258.UAA13232@panzer.kdm.org>; from Kenneth D. Merry on Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 08:58:39PM -0600 References: <199910271540.LAA04366@lor.watermarkgroup.com> <199910280258.UAA13232@panzer.kdm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 27 October 1999 at 20:58:39 -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > Luoqi Chen wrote... >>>>> In message <199910262211.PAA94274@freefall.freebsd.org> Luoqi Chen writes: >>>>> : Enable tagged queueing (should it be spelled as queuing?) by default. >>>>> >>> >>>> http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk/elt/dictionary/cmd_search.asp?key=queue*1+0&dict=b >>> >>>> They spell it 'queueing'. I suppose it can be spelled either way. >>> >>> The relevant question in this case is, how does the SCSI standard >>> spell it? >>> >> Good point! It is 'queuing' in the X3T9.2/375 draft I have :-) > > We should probably just leave it as "you can spell it either way", > otherwise I'm sure someone will feel an uncontrollable urge to change all > occurrences of one spelling to the other in the tree. (Thus the reason I > even bothered to point out you can spell it two different ways.) Agreed. This is the point I've been making. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991028101617.29808>