From owner-freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 29 17:36:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ADC1065675; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.jayachandran@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B4C8FC13; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so3883006vws.13 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:36:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=kMdK8+LllON67HOje/xLWJa37oCszx36VnfSGaWfcu4=; b=s0HPYuSRsqT09XU6LjL+V7Lfd5bsR2fA3LZbhq0tOsQwK347NLgAbyS4Qc9aFINVYx KREJleZvU+po9Occ/y3IyQKASNXDwWgD9B89sO1o4iOIN2v+2GB7rzTilsx7pou9+i0A fU4wurf++3rJvE9H5c0Q1e68m8moejU/gHE5Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=CNpBJnxzXYsbnbi/e0CiYuXQru1NxrSfyhWScqaMx/eh5m7jmR2HCqh568KtJcFXzb /QU7ApjBOAvnDyzbBnW/mdyjFlZVHgb2nBLoyCB/7vp9R/yu4AhNOQ+XQyvFz4zCX+ZY g+yELAEhYNM0L2QhkbtdNgS7tnDgyM5gTBeMM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.98.97 with SMTP id eh1mr211442vdb.7.1304098572499; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.182.105 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 23:06:12 +0530 Message-ID: From: "Jayachandran C." To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: 64 bit time_t in 32 bit ABI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:36:37 -0000 In sys/mips/include/_types.h, I see | 119 typedef __int64_t __time_t; /* time()... */ Which as far as I can see, is not right for the 32-bit ABIs. But this definition has been there for a long time, so I would like to know if there is any reason for this? Since this is a user-visible type, changing it would break binary compatibility. Thanks, JC.