Date: Wed, 3 Apr 96 9:44:44 MET DST From: Greg Lehey <lehey.pad@sni.de> To: alk@Think.COM (Tony Kimball) Cc: lehey.pad@sni.de, questions@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: stty -echo -nl, emacs Message-ID: <199604030629.IAA17564@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de> In-Reply-To: <199604021607.KAA14605@compound>; from "Tony Kimball" at Apr 2, 96 10:07 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Date: Tue, 2 Apr 96 10:40:00 MET DST > From: Greg Lehey <lehey.pad@sni.de> > >> I am using es, sans editline/readline. > > I don't know that one. Is it new? > > Extensible Shell. A lambda-calc shell based on Plan 9's rc. > There was a USENIX paper on it a couple of years ago. > > You probably want to set erase to ^H and kill to (say) ^U here. > > Kinda moot under Emacs, tho. > > The rest of the stty stuff looks fine. I can't see anything that's > appending the ^M, so I assume it's the shell. > > Same as sh, csh, and no combination of flags that I have found will > stop it. Oh well, I can fix it in lisp. > > I see the ^Ms, but I'm confused. Above, you said 'es', now you're > saying 'ash'. To the best of my knowledge, neither are standard with > FreeBSD, though I at least know of ash. > > I should rather have said 'FreeBSD sh' than 'ash'. > > Do you have a particular > reason to want to stay with this shell? > > Can't hardly get away from it ;-) Well, looking at all this, I'd say it's a port problem, not a FreeBSD problem. Where did you get the binaries? Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604030629.IAA17564>