From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Dec 10 9:50: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D7314D32 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:50:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id JAA28603; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:50:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:50:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199912101750.JAA28603@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Alexander Langer Subject: Re: misc/15405: Ports Don't Upgrade Reply-To: Alexander Langer Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/15405; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Langer To: dave@syix.com Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/15405: Ports Don't Upgrade Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 18:45:16 +0100 Thus spake dave@syix.com (dave@syix.com): > WHY can't we have a make upgrade target? It would almost make sense, and doing a make deinstall doesn't work if your ports collection is up to date, and who wants to have to type all that stuff to do a pkg_delete Some of the FreeBSD developers thought about a version control system at FreeBSD-Con. It's in development (I believe), or it's at least planned. It's much work, so please be patient :) This is really not something for a PR, please close. Alex -- I doubt, therefore I might be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message