From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Jul 10 10:48:06 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA14515 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 10:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw1.asacomputers.com (root@gw1.asacomputers.com [204.69.220.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA14510 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 10:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gw1.asacomputers.com id HAA02729; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 07:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <2.2.32.19970710174452.01178650@gw1> X-Sender: rajadnya@gw1 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 10:44:52 -0700 To: Anthony.Kimball@East.Sun.COM From: Kedar Subject: Re: Q:PCI bridges-extenders supported Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 12:27 PM 7/10/97 -0500, you wrote: >Quoth Kedar on Thu, 10 July: >: On the I2O issue, I could probably work something out with >: Supermicro. Let me see if they are willing to share any information. >If they do, they are breaking the law. That thought came to mind as soon as I sent the mail. Too late. It was supposed to mean "as far as compatibility issues went". It would be ridiculous to ask them for information of the restricted kind. I'd better stop adding to this thread unless I have something concrete. The mouth is not big enough for both feet!! :( Kedar.