Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 12:08:18 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Way forward with BIND 8 Message-ID: <20030607110818.GA1895@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20030606231209.F15459@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <20030605235254.W5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030606175954.GQ65470@perrin.int.nxad.com> <20030606231209.F15459@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:33:40PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > If we can get enough consensus, and most importantly, people to test it, > I'd be very interested in the idea of removing BIND from 6-Current > altogether, with the exception of whatever libs/headers are deemed > essential, and the userland binaries dig and host. Since I can already > hear the whining about not having nslookup, we should probably include > that too, although I'd dearly love to nuke it. I'd say nuke nslookup as well if this route gets taken. It doesn't exist in the BIND9 world anyway, so at best including it would only delay the whining. Ceri --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030607110818.GA1895>