From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 22 15:58:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA13553 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 15:58:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lepton.nuc.net (wheelman@lepton.nuc.net [204.49.61.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA13543 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 15:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (wheelman@localhost) by lepton.nuc.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA00835; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:58:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:58:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Jaime Bozza To: Doug White cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Driver Question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Doug White wrote: > > Basically, is the 3C900 support mature enough to use in a live situation? > > It worked okay for me. I had a lot of input and output errors, although I > think this was linked to the cable I was using. > > The 3c900 has very little onboard cache; if this machine is going to be > busy, you may not want to use this. Ok, thanks for the response. Any recommendations then for PCI-based cards? Is the 3C905 (10/100) card better at all? Or should I just stick with my trusty 3C509's? Or, perhaps, another manufacturer? Have you heard much about the Intel PCI Ethernet cards? Jaime Bozza Nucleus Communications, Inc.