Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:58:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Jaime Bozza <wheelman@nuc.net> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Driver Question Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970422175640.805A-100000@lepton.nuc.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970422151127.24344I-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Doug White wrote: > > Basically, is the 3C900 support mature enough to use in a live situation? > > It worked okay for me. I had a lot of input and output errors, although I > think this was linked to the cable I was using. > > The 3c900 has very little onboard cache; if this machine is going to be > busy, you may not want to use this. Ok, thanks for the response. <G> Any recommendations then for PCI-based cards? Is the 3C905 (10/100) card better at all? Or should I just stick with my trusty 3C509's? Or, perhaps, another manufacturer? Have you heard much about the Intel PCI Ethernet cards? Jaime Bozza Nucleus Communications, Inc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970422175640.805A-100000>