From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 12 18:31:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF50216A4CE
	for <acpi@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:31:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from postal3.es.net (postal3.es.net [198.128.3.207])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A02343D3F
	for <acpi@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:31:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from oberman@es.net)
Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29])
        by postal3.es.net (Postal Node 3) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465;
        Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:31:12 -0700
Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id D1C6D5D04;
	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:44:56 PDT."
             <411AAF78.5010206@root.org> 
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:31:12 -0700
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
Message-Id: <20040812183112.D1C6D5D04@ptavv.es.net>
cc: acpi@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ACPI mpsafe patch for testing 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:31:13 -0000

> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:44:56 -0700
> From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
> Sender: owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
> 
> Attached is the latest patch for running ACPI mpsafe.  It has been 
> pretty well tested and is ready for wider testing.  It's especially good 
> to run it with WITNESS enabled.  To test, just use it with your system 
> normally.

OK. Patch installed and running with WITNESS on my T30. (This would
probably be more interesting on an SMP system, but I don't have an SMP
running CURRENT that I can play with.)

So far, so good! WITNESS reports nothing related to ACPI. (It does
report the previously noted rip6_output sleep problem, but that's it.)

5-Stable seems to be really coming together. Thanks for all of the work,
Nate! Hope everyone else reports the same results.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634