From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Apr  4 11:28:40 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA22387
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 11:28:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA22366
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 11:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA17299; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 12:26:28 -0700
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 12:26:28 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199604041926.MAA17299@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Cc: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams), root@deadline.snafu.de,
        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: tty-level buffer overflows - what to do?
In-Reply-To: <199604041919.NAA01863@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
References: <199604041912.MAA17250@rocky.sri.MT.net>
	<199604041919.NAA01863@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[ overflows due to IDE interface ]
> 
> Run "du /" and watch your serial comms get choppy :-/
> 
> If you are running kernel mode SLIP or PPP, remember that you have several
> additional advantages over the described configuration:

Ahh, I'm using kernel mode SLIP and PPP, so that's probably why.


Nate