Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:43:50 +0200 From: marius@alchemy.franken.de To: sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Fully hosted Message-ID: <20020519214350.A41498@newtrinity.default-network.net> In-Reply-To: <20020519113335.A42109@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, May 19, 2002 at 11:33:35AM -0700 References: <20020519113335.A42109@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 11:33:35AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > Many already know this, but I wanted to report that FreeBSD/sparc64 is > now fully hosted (and from stock sources). great! but what "stock sources" are you refering to, those from the p4 tree or those from cvs ? i tried about a week ago with the p4 sources and those failed in various places on the way to a new 'world', well libc_r was one... what in general are nowadays the differences between the sparc64 p4 tree and the main cvs repository, there seem to be (the same) sparc64-specific commits to both trees, while src/sys/sparc64/fpu is only in the p4 one ? or to put it another way, when can one expect the both trees to be merged and the p4 tree to "go away" ? > > A post-remove-perl-from-/usr/src `make world' on my Blade100 took 2 1/2 > hours on its stock IDE disk. I have NO_WERROR, NO_GDB, and NOLIBC_R set. > > A `make world' with the gcc31 port and > CXX=/usr/local/bin/sparc64-undermydesk-freebsd5.0-g++31 > takes about 2 hrs 45 min. (this adds groff to the build) > uhm, what is the difference between the in-tree gcc31 and the gcc31 port ? no g++ (for sparc64) ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020519214350.A41498>