From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 22 20:16:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F2216A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:16:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.tiscali.cz (stateless2.tiscali.cz [213.235.135.71])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1B043D58
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:16:46 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from hsn@netmag.cz)
Received: from sanatana.dharma (212.90.236.175) by mail.tiscali.cz (6.7.021)
	id 40E84FD100786003 for ports@freebsd.org;
	Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:16:45 +0200
Received: from hsn@localhost
	by sanatana.dharma (Exim 4.34_0 FreeBSD) id 1BnjTR-000Bis-K5
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 21:43:25 +0200
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 21:43:25 +0200
From: Radim Kolar <hsn@netmag.cz>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040722194325.GA43562@sanatana.dharma>
Mail-Followup-To: ports@freebsd.org
References: <c21e92e204071919263f570dff@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040720094726.GA30095@sanatana.dharma>
	<20040721002038.78861963@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040721002038.78861963@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Subject: Re: sysutils/portindex weirdness
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:16:47 -0000

> Is this what you are talkin' about ?
no. it fails with recursion limit exceed. I can solve this problem by
swaping two lines in code, but i think that better is to let portindex die
instead. Latest public version has no known bugs in index generation or in
program itself.

Your problem is caused by not reading upgrade instructions in readme.txt
you must delete old .pck database.