From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 15:50:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A04C16A4FE for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from gromit.dlib.vt.edu (gromit.dlib.vt.edu [128.173.49.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F17F43DAD for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:49:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org (pool-71-254-64-250.ronkva.east.verizon.net [71.254.64.250]) by gromit.dlib.vt.edu (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7NFnuUK096983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:49:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7NFnuSG050273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:49:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: (from paul@localhost) by zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k7NFntfK050272; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:49:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) From: Paul Mather To: Divacky Roman In-Reply-To: <20060821134635.GA27362@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <1156096970.19717.12.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> <20060820204338.GA76869@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <1156121912.32130.22.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> <20060821080748.GA14037@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20060821134635.GA27362@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:49:53 -0400 Message-Id: <1156348193.1499.11.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linuxulator: syscall statfs64 not implemented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:50:32 -0000 On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 15:46 +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > it seems like very trivial so expect patch today ;) > > www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/statfs64.patch > > pls tell me if this works, thnx The patch applied and built on i386. However, when I run the resultant kernel, the problem of the "syscall statfs64 not implemented" messages goes away but my Tivoli backup still fails (in a different way). (The same Tivoli client and setup worked on i386 -CURRENT prior to mid-August, and currently is working on an i386 6.1-STABLE system.) Now, when the scheduled backup runs, I get things like this in my dsmerror.log: 08/23/06 02:58:37 TransErrno: Unexpected error from GetFSInfo:statfs, errno = 14 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1228E Sending of object '/backup' failed 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1063E The specified path is not a valid file system or logical volume name. 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1228E Sending of object '/backup/var' failed 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1063E The specified path is not a valid file system or logical volume name. 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1228E Sending of object '/backup/usr' failed 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1063E The specified path is not a valid file system or logical volume name. 08/23/06 02:58:40 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'DESKTOP_DAILY_BACKUP' failed. Return code = 12. I don't know if this indicates that there is a problem with the implementation of statfs64/statfs, now. (I don't know if it complicates matters, but I'm backing up mounted snapshots.) Cheers, Paul. -- e-mail: paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid." --- Frank Vincent Zappa