From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Apr 12 10:47:50 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from goku.cl.msu.edu (goku.cl.msu.edu [35.8.3.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F312237BFC5
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dervish@goku.cl.msu.edu)
Received: (from dervish@localhost)
	by goku.cl.msu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA87466
	for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:39:14 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from dervish)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:39:14 -0400
From: Bush Doctor <dervish@goku.cl.msu.edu>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: A question on port building?
Message-ID: <20000412133914.B87373@goku.cl.msu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
WWW-Home-Page: http://bantu.cl.msu.edu
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

This question arises from something I noticed when trying to
build codecrusader. (Thanxs to Kent)  It seems that codecrusader
depends on bison during its build process.  Now that bison is part
of the system, is it sufficient to have "USE_BISON=yes" in the
Makefile?  I'm asking because I see from bsd.port.mk

# USE_NEWGCC    - Says that the port requirest the latest gcc, either in
#                                 the system or installed from a port.

and bison is also in ports.


thanxs ...

#;^)
-- 
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.

bush doctor
<dervish@goku.cl.msu.edu>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message