From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 4 13:05:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA00633 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 13:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sirocco.CC.McGill.CA (sirocco.CC.McGill.CA [132.206.27.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA00611 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 13:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA (maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA [132.206.35.2]) by sirocco.CC.McGill.CA (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA07001 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 16:10:17 -0400 X-SMTP-Posting-Origin: maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA (maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA [132.206.35.2]) Received: by maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA with Microsoft Mail id <01BC7101.0FB61B30@maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA>; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 16:05:03 -0400 Message-ID: <01BC7101.0FB61B30@maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA> From: Yves Lepage To: "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" Subject: Why not make the list closed? Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 16:04:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi all, Here's an idea: why not make the list closed? So that only subscribers can post to it? The bugtraq list uses a list manager software that does the equivalent of callback when a person subscribes. It sends a request for confirmation of their subscription to the new member. If no confirmation is received with X days, the new member is removed and the subscription was never effective. Looks like the noise/signal ratio is growing on this list, it is getting close to 50% now. Regards, Yves Lepage