From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 01:33:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1384A16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:33:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63DA43D2F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:33:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (scottl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i621apRN076788; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:36:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (scottl@localhost)i621anSM076785; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:36:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pooker.samsco.org: scottl owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:36:49 -0600 (MDT) From: Scott Long Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.org To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040701193521.E76767@pooker.samsco.org> References: <200407010219.44628.linimon@lonesome.com> <20040701194357.GA1115@gothmog.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: Mark Linimon cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: does FreeBSD still support CPUs without math coprocessors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 01:33:25 -0000 On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, [iso-8859-1] Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas writes: > > On 2004-07-01 13:36, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > It was removed last July (src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES rev 1.1091) > > We should probably update this comment then, right? > > I guess so... > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no Done Scott