Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 13:11:16 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new license idea? Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20000919130855.00d548a0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20000919195242.B72836@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000919124101.05089eb0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20000919104443.00bf44b0@localhost> <20000919160157.A70731@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20000919104443.00bf44b0@localhost> <20000919175403.B71735@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20000919124101.05089eb0@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:52 PM 9/19/2000, j mckitrick wrote: >I understand that there are 2 forks in windows development, but how are they >used to bludgeon, since they are targeted at 2 different audiences? Microsoft attempts to create proprietary forks of STANDARDS, not programs. (Oh, and by "proprietary," I mean in the way it's PROPERLY defined, not in the way Stallman attempts to redefine it). The messes they created with CHAP and Kerberos are examples. What they did was not innovative and not backward-compatible. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20000919130855.00d548a0>