From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 16:11:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660EB106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjg@soe.ucsc.edu) Received: from mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu (mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.48.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E778FC20 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu (mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.48.32]) by mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC011008656 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:11:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Gustafson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <277645537.336611277914282937.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [128.114.49.22] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.20_GA_3127.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 ([unknown])/5.0.20_GA_3127.RHEL5_64) Subject: fusefs-cryptofs vs fusefs-cryptofs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:11:24 -0000 Hi, all. I was wondering if anyone could offer any personal experience with using either fusefs-cryptofs or fusefs-cryptofs. I'm going to be bringing a FreeBSD OpenLDAP server online soon and I need to have the contents of the OpenLDAP database encrypted in the event of a physical security breach, and so I need a reliable and efficient disk encryption scheme to handle that. I was thinking of encrypting /var/db/openldap using either fusefs-cryptofs or fusefs-cryptofs, but I'm not sure which would be better to use for this sort of application. Thanks! Tim Gustafson Baskin School of Engineering UC Santa Cruz tjg@soe.ucsc.edu 831-459-5354