Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:18:26 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@niksun.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: R3000Z Laptop Status Message-ID: <423EF3D2.9050205@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <200503211113.52233.jkim@niksun.com> References: <2fd864e05032105366eaf8b2c@mail.gmail.com> <200503211049.11110.jkim@niksun.com> <423EF13B.2040008@samsco.org> <200503211113.52233.jkim@niksun.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Monday 21 March 2005 11:07 am, Scott Long wrote: > >>Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> >>>On Monday 21 March 2005 08:36 am, Astrodog wrote: >>> >>>>I was wondering if the R3000Z fixes have been committed to the >>>>RELENG_5 branch, I don't see anything on the lists about it. >>>>Should I expect 5.4 to work with the R3000 line? >>> >>>Yes. hint.atkbd.0.flags="0x9" is all you need now. Try the >>>latest snapshot and let us know. >>> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Jung-uk Kim >> >>Is there any way that these systems can be detected at runtime and >>have the work-arounds be automatically activated? > > > I believe DMI-based quirk table is the only way but we don't want to > do that, right? > > Jung-uk Kim > > >>Scott Well, it's gross, but it's not impossible to do. Is there a technical reason why we wouldn't want this? Are there any alternatives, like detecting a signature in ACPI, either a text string or a certain bit of ASL bytecode? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?423EF3D2.9050205>