From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Sep  9 01:14:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA29046
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 01:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca32-19.ix.netcom.com [199.35.209.83])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA29028
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 01:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id BAA19512; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 01:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 01:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709090813.BAA19512@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au
CC: grog@lemis.com, bmcgover@cisco.com, hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <19970909143254.52297@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> (message from David Dawes on Tue, 9 Sep 1997 14:32:54 +1000)
Subject: Re: re: libXExExt
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Having said that, if an Imakefile is referring to it directly, the
 * Imakefile is broken (the fvwm 1.x Imakefile is *VERY* broken -- which

fvwm built fine during my last package tree build two weeks ago, so it
is fine.  It should be the user's Imake config files.

 * This shouldn't be a run-time issue since I don't think we (XFree86)
 * made the mistake of ever building a shared libXExExt (which would have made
 * the bad idea even worse).

That is my recollection also.

Satoshi