From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 29 15:22:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E28CB74 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEEDD2DB for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9) with SMTP id sATFMF1p052381 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 16:22:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 29 Nov 2014 16:22:15 +0100 Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 16:22:15 +0100 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Update of security/gnupg fails because of conflict with security/dirmngr Message-ID: <20141129152215.GA52298@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <5479B154.9090606@rawbw.com> <20141129125631.GA50784@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20141129143900.27369fe5@freedom> <20141129085441.0cb00043@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141129085441.0cb00043@scorpio> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:22:19 -0000 --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jerry wrote: > The "nvidia-driver" port had a similar problem. That problem has been > corrected. Perhaps applying the same methodology here would be fruitful. If doing that would fix it, then at least I think it's good news that the problems are with individual ports and not with the ports infrastructure itself (pkg, portmaster, /usr/ports/Mk/*, etc.). AvW --=20 Imbibo, ergo sum. --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUeeSnAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8FokP/isjXZh8k+9R6hejXUn/Hzw5 AD7dK/ovb+8JxBzvZlpjxp1XIEjJ8+CKN099PPYklfu0bAmxbDhcL19I7vZTAVMY xCDbMHIT/WZcDyxLQwnMvVl2jKRG6JYknqwqu00FmkNPUbjNQVJLf7HU5VORyNLP JpkkPgEhFN3d0o9DSqR7liNYoe+Qglzn6TBRgjIn/Aq1Nv6Pfpm9JPt9flpVIBuB 7KGdsmngY1CyqfqdzbzpbSFh3jqAnhEDZGtiZp2I6ueApHR9XCpzD1Lld2VtWnNM BzQhQ7k99/tg63+Cd9f2M/oRn9NMcXKvaDiUwBUbc9NxEcqmnE6JhdZBXeGcJk9d ttghrRU+Oq5ecL2/9+7g3l2glE8dcj/XROS/b260D2vFXwPrhtZdKMQLZ6IgoVXx ekgyooZiK/ry2Q5JM1IaWrPLfE8dow/uHf2IPCo+lvNdd0biCHNaj8/zhWLOJcOw 0uSE+f2hXB1GugWRViAfJnvg2CcNv4bcnn0NYU8HknGv3bGRtLz3QvsbBjLLBxQ9 c76ji4AkFMuhA/t7AwHcshRS9HlVumWIA5VSBWuS0z2fLSuaDNQcqxW+qSSbbz+8 PrhrxBdTyNLNZiJ/OxL5j/YRi3g1kWLLDYEbtVZVB003YJbc98sFLEBy6lMtD912 QdwQloThSwqx18HDe4Yd =LrKR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--