From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jul 27 12:29:26 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id MAA03329
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 12:29:26 -0700
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (sri.MT.net [204.94.231.129])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA03323
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 12:29:23 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA01546; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 13:31:20 -0600
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 13:31:20 -0600
Message-Id: <199507271931.NAA01546@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Cc: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams), hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ld.so: ivs: libcompat.so.2.0: Undefined error: 0 
In-Reply-To: <199507271820.LAA07766@rah.star-gate.com>
References: <199507271446.IAA01203@rocky.sri.MT.net>
	<199507271820.LAA07766@rah.star-gate.com>
Reply-To: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams)
From: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Amancio Hasty, Jr. writes:
>  > The solution is to remove the dependency of libcompat in whatever
>  > program requires libcompat and send the changes back to the maintainer.
>  > 
> 
> Does mwm depend on libcompat?

I don't know.  I don't *think* so, but I didn't compile up the sources
of your version of mwm.


Nate