Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:46:19 +0100 From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ?? Message-ID: <36a4f390-c89a-d7dc-cdc2-3dcca16d73c1@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <30953625-3a12-4514-6309-62fc91dea780@selasky.org> References: <2f68ffd8-d1f5-7c29-2703-2327187c1069@selasky.org> <e4e8eef2-367a-da6e-0b1f-b1e41719731b@FreeBSD.org> <30953625-3a12-4514-6309-62fc91dea780@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/26/20 3:20 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 2020-02-26 13:18, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
>> On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>> ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by
>>> "timidity"
>>>
>>> pkg install libarc
>>
>> It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not
>> included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the
>> timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs).
>>
>> I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this way.
>>
>> Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of the
>> timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?
>>
>
> No specific reason. I just wanted to test some MIDI files.
>
> And did "pkg instal xxx". Is timidity++ not a valid port/package?
It is a valid port. I am not sure why libarc is not a run-time
dependency here. Maybe just an oversight.
I've committed a patch in r527232
Cheers,
Mateusz
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36a4f390-c89a-d7dc-cdc2-3dcca16d73c1>