From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 29 12:51:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BF316A5A3 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:51:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ns.kfs.ru) Received: from ns.kfs.ru (kfs.kfs.ru [62.183.117.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A764403E for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:22:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ns.kfs.ru) Received: from bsam by ns.kfs.ru with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Eh4VT-0009gx-98; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:22:47 +0300 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20051128082406.GA14563@xor.obsecurity.org> <85963626@serv3.int.kfs.ru> <20051129105055.rukxqmi7j4gccokc@netchild.homeip.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:22:47 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20051129105055.rukxqmi7j4gccokc@netchild.homeip.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:50:55 +0100") Message-ID: <60999752@serv3.int.kfs.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ports-i386@pointyhat.freebsd.org: linux-glib2-2.4.8 pkg-plist errors on i386 4] X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:51:58 -0000 On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:50:55 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > This should be fixed by: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=89678 > Yes, and I have the same fix and a fix for atk already in my tree since ... > Saturday evening I think. But I hadn't time to commit it yet. Maybe today in > the evening. OK. > P.S. FYI: the patch is missing a portrevision bump. At one of my previous PRs with small patches I wrote that I'm not sure if a portrevision should be bumpted. You didn't comment on it. Bit now I know. Thanks. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider