From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 20 14:46:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4238106566B for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:46:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C978FC16 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so4354542iwn.13 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 07:46:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.193.233 with SMTP id dv41mr3139500ibb.186.1305902793951; Fri, 20 May 2011 07:46:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.231.13.139 with HTTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 07:46:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 10:46:33 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NM9IMUP1KEP21F4ibSphYuoHVbI Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Xn Nooby Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Over-whelmed by ports and package tools X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:46:34 -0000 On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Xn Nooby wrote: >> Also try to go with portsnap for ports IMHO it's the path of least >> resistance ;-) > > I will try portsnap, and read about the pkgdb database. =A0If all these > tools ultimately resolve to pkgdb, I will try to learn about that. > > I have tried PC-BSD, and look forward to version 9.0. =A0I really don't > like KDE, though. =A0I hear some rumblings about a Gnome developer Jajajaja. THAT IS EXACTLY why I don't use PC-BSD ! > wanting to drop BSD support, so maybe I better start liking KDE. > PC-BSD seems to have done a great job reproducing the way Mac's > install software, by using self-contained bundles (PBI's). And next > version of PBI is supposed to not need a GUI. I'm sure I will be > trying the next version PC-BSD. Hopefully to be released soon. > > thanks! >