From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 10 17:50:21 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3173B99
 for <arch@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CFA3E05
 for <arch@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1YLEwz-000KZZ-Ly; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:50:17 +0300
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:50:17 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
Subject: Re: removing bdes..
Message-ID: <20150210175017.GC67127@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <20150209181502.GF1953@funkthat.com>
 <20150210151812.GB67127@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20150210174301.GT1953@funkthat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150210174301.GT1953@funkthat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:50:21 -0000

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:43:01AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:

> Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote this message on Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 18:18 +0300:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:15:02AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > 
> > > So, I happen to stuble across bdes recently and think we should remove
> > > it..
> > > 
> > > I'm fine w/ making it a port so that people who need it can use it...
> > > 
> > > Especially considering:
> > >      The DES cipher should no longer be considered secure.  Please consider
> > >      using a more modern alternative.
> > > 
> > > Though sadly, that comment was added almost 15 years after DES was
> > > brute forced by DEEPCrack.
> > 
> > Clear text also insecure. Do you remove all clear text?
> 
> If I have to answer that question for you, I don't need to respond to
> you...
> 
> Once you have a valid argument for keeping it, I'll respond...

Keeping support for DES encrypting/decrytpting create vulnerability?
or support difficult? What problem resolv removing DES support (and
break compatibility)?