From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Dec 11 12:11:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from netcore.fi (netcore.fi [193.94.160.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BAB14CFE for ; Sat, 11 Dec 1999 12:10:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pekkas@netcore.fi) Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA15690; Sat, 11 Dec 1999 22:10:22 +0200 Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 22:10:22 +0200 (EET) From: Pekka Savola To: John Polstra Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Route table leaks In-Reply-To: <199912111952.LAA01097@vashon.polstra.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, John Polstra wrote: > > > FreeBSD 3.0-19981015-BETA #1: Tue Jan 12 03:30:56 CST 1999 > > > > > > routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 435741 0 0 16,32,64,128,256 > > > > Doesn't happen on 2.2... > > It doesn't happen on most 3.x or 4.x systems either. For starters, > you won't see it unless you're running routed. Even then, you may > or may not see it. I don't know whether the bug is present in 2.2 > or not. Speaking of which, would someone please explain to me why the heck routed is started by default (/etc/rc.conf) ? I can't believe that many people would need it.. Regards, Pekka Savola To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message