From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Apr 13 07:38:16 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA07462
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 13 Apr 1997 07:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from obiwan.aceonline.com.au (obiwan.aceonline.com.au [203.103.90.67])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA07456
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 1997 07:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (adrian@localhost)
	by obiwan.aceonline.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA00583;
	Sun, 13 Apr 1997 22:26:14 +0800 (WST)
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 22:26:13 +0800 (WST)
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@obiwan.aceonline.com.au>
To: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
cc: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD pros (was Re: linux 128 MB limit)
In-Reply-To: <199704121535.RAA19282@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970413222528.356G-100000@obiwan.aceonline.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > > Does the limitation of the linux kernel to 128 MB Ram still exist?
> > 
> > Whoops, wrong list...
> 
> You mean I should have asked in -hackers ?
> OK, anyone knowing - I'm seeking for further pros for FreeBSD - 
> if there is an inherent 128 MB limitation in linux kernels?
> 

Sorry .. limitation to 128mb?

I know of machines on both Linux and FreeBSD which run >128mb RAM.
(In fact, I know of a Linux box running with over 400mb RAM).

Cya

Adrian