From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Aug 26 21: 2:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [207.240.140.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8E715E00 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:02:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freyes@inch.com) Received: from win98 (freyes.static.inch.com [207.240.212.43]) by arutam.inch.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/UTIL-INCH-2.0.0) with SMTP id AAA23203; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:01:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199908270401.AAA23203@arutam.inch.com> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "Joseph Scott" Cc: "advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG" Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:01:34 -0400 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 98 (4.10.1998) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: More changes to new advocacy site. Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:29:54 -0700, Joseph Scott wrote: >slashdot already. I think it's still a little too early to spread word Agree. >2. What are the capabilities for the site to grow and expand? This is essential.. that the site can handle a reasonable amount of load. Idially it would be best to have it hosted at freebsd.org, but I am not sure how this could be worked out, specially since the new site is running with MySQL. This point has been brought up before. Using MySQL gives the site more power/flexibility, but makes it more difficult to port, and on this case, to get approval to run on someone elses computer (i.e. freebsd.org). >Do you have people who have >offered to help at different levels ( like reviewing/auth'ing This is one of the reasons why SlashDot has suceeded. There is a team of people approving/trashing news. We need something simmilar up/front. Possibly a couple of categories: -Approvers. People who can approve articles/notes entered in the system. -Coders. People to enhance functionality. I don't think too much writing should be done in this site. Best coordinate articles with FreebsdZine or daemon news. >3. What are the objectives of the site, my impression was that we were >aiming for something of mix between slashdot.org and linuxtoday.com, >with some relation to linux.com. Given the number of FreeBSD related news are not that frequent we may want to include other news of interest to the FreeBSD community. In particular I like the idea of reviewing a FreeBSD site per week. In particular smaller sites. Could be site with info about FreeBSD or sites running on FreeBSD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message