Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Jun 1998 17:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
From:      dima@best.net (Dima Ruban)
To:        bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Cc:        committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FD_SETSIZE
Message-ID:  <199806050002.RAA15067@burka.rdy.com>
In-Reply-To: <199806042233.IAA23919@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from Bruce Evans at "Jun 5, 98 08:33:21 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans writes:
> >If I recall correctly, the -current select() implementation was enhanced to
> >make better use of memory and copyin/out with large vector sizes.  This has
> >not happened with -stable, so increasing the vector size might not be an
> >idea as it could have a [slight?] detrimental effect.  I don't remember 
> >the details of the situation well enough but I am pretty sure that there 
> >was some reason why it wasn't taken across.
> 
> I didn't merge the kernel changes because they wouldn't have fixed a bug.

Which one bug? Bug in select()?

> 
> Bruce
> 

-- dima

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806050002.RAA15067>