Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 22:27:23 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Cc: markm@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: init vs libcrypt Message-ID: <199605102027.WAA25186@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199605100759.RAA02883@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from Bruce Evans at "May 10, 96 05:59:48 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Bruce Evans wrote: > init now links to libscrypt in the !secure case. This defeats the point > of the libcrypt -> libscrypt link. I never understood why it cannot simply link -lcrypt, and let the symlink decide which one to use. Some trickery will be needed for ``make release'' in order to get both versions built, but that's another matter. I've once conditionalized some Makefiles on RELEASEDIR since this happens to be always set while building a release. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605102027.WAA25186>