From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 7 04:32:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8DD16A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 04:32:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D16843D2D for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 04:32:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:26037 helo=[192.168.2.100]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C4XeZ-000PsX-64 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:32:23 +0000 Message-ID: <413D39D7.6050009@zonnet.nl> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 06:32:23 +0200 From: Nico Meijer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040905 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <7A727F81-FCE2-11D8-8BE7-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com> <008901c4934e$a7c5b260$0200000a@SAGEAME> <413B5F14.6090405@zonnet.nl> <200409051452.06236.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> <413C0FAE.1000502@zonnet.nl> <20040907003500.GA11100@panix.com> In-Reply-To: <20040907003500.GA11100@panix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [another "me too"] Re: portindex/portindexdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:32:24 -0000 Hi Joe, > Sigh: Lighten up! ;-) > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:587: > [BUG] Bus Error > ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd4] Have you tried replacing the portsdb-sequence with `portindex && portindexdb`? So: - cvsup (or whatever tool you use) - portindex - portindexdb - portversion -vL = (or whatever switches you use) The upside to using portindex is that it merges changes instead of building the entire index every time. So your first run will take quite some time, but your following runs will run quite a bit faster. HTH and good luck... Nico